“You should be able to throw 90% of your personal best on even your worst day.”
Lance Deal – 2015 National Throws Coaches Association Conference
Last night I watched what could be considered the biggest upset of the 2017 College Football season. A seemingly unbeatable Clemson Tigers visited the Syracuse Orange, in what should have been a relatively easy game for Clemson. However, in the opening moments of the game, Clemson’s starting quarterback was injured, and had to leave the game. That moment changed the complexion of the game for both Clemson and Syracuse. Not because Clemson’s starting quarterback was injured, but because of the heightened near moment expectations for their backup quarterback. From having relatively little to no expectation entering the game, he was now thrust into a situation that he may not have been expecting to be placed in. Especially so early in the game. Did Clemson’s performance drop 10% by losing their starting quarterback? Shouldn’t a 90% Clemson Tiger team still be able to beat a 100% Syracuse Orange team?
I open with my synopsis of what occurred last night in Syracuse because as I was watching the game, a quote by Lance Deal popped in my head. Back in December of 2015, I attended the National Throws Coaches Association Conference. At the conference, American Record Holder and Olympic Silver Medalist Hammer Thrower Lance Deal gave a talk about throwing. At the tail end of his talk, he said that, “You should be able to throw 90% of your personal best on even your worst day.” He said this with great enthusiasm and vigor.
College Football and Track & Field really don’t have many similarities. I’m not going to get lost in the weeds here with semantics. Watching the game though really got me thinking a lot about the upcoming 2017-18 season.
As you watch College or Pro Football on Thursday, Saturday, and Sunday nights, you might hear commentators make a statement like, “Anyone can beat anyone today.” You may hear it being said more in NFL commentary, however anyone really can beat anyone. The same can be said for throwing as well. Regardless of the 90% rule. Let me give you an example.
In May of 2016, Luis competed at the Division III Outdoor Track & Field Championships at Wartburg College in Iowa. The first flight of the men’s hammer competition had some fantastic weather. It was sunny. Fairly warm. A great day to throw. Then, as the second flight started warming up and started throwing, it began to rain.
The mood began to change. You could see the looks on some throwers face change. They didn’t look that happy. Of the top 10 seeded throwers, only a handful were able to produce seasonal best throws. I know that three of them had career bests. The top three throwers had career days, even with the weather as bad as it was. It may not happen often, but three throwers from the first flight earned All-American status. They placed in the top 8. It was a great competition. Higher seeded throwers were not able to perform to their best of their abilities. If they would have performed up to their 90%, they would have made the finals and probably earned All-American status. For some reason, on that particular day they could not throw up to 90%. Did the rain really take away 10% of their performance? I recall a couple of Olympic Hammer competitions being contested in the rain. There were still some great performances. Granted, the level of competition may be different, however the nerves may have been the same.
Now, back to that 90% statement. Even though it was raining, shouldn’t have a majority of the throwers from the second flight still have thrown at least up to 90% of their personal best? Was the weather that much of a hindrance? I’m not really sure how much the weather played into it. Yet, it begs the question, if everyone should throw at about 90% of their best, regardless of the circumstances, would the Syracuse Orange throwers of the world ever be able to beat the Clemson Tigers throwers of the world (probably not a good analogy, but it’s the best I can think of right now).
As with Division I College Football, anything can happen at any given time in Track & Field as well. You see, in Track, you really only have control over a few variables; training, recovery, nutrition, mindfulness, attitude, and mindset-just to name a few. We, as coaches, have relatively little control of what happens at meets. Specific to throwing, once an athlete enters the circle, their coach really has no control over what may happen. We spend hundreds of hours practicing during the season in the hopes of making the top 15 and qualifying for the Division III Indoor or Outdoor National Championships. All of that training boils down to maybe two or three minutes of throwing throughout the course of a season. A lot comes down to chance. I would say there is some luck involved.
Yes, I believe there is a bit of luck at play when it comes to throwing. Now, with indoor track, all elements are fairly equal. You may need to travel some distance to compete, but the weather inside is pretty nice. A ton of things can still happen though-you forget your shoes, your glove rips, your weight breaks, you only get one warm-up throw….You see where I’m going with this. I wouldn’t call those things luck, but randomness and chance. Outdoor is a completely different animal. In Western, NY, we have snow on the ground through mid-April sometimes. The Southern and Mid-Western schools probably don’t have to worry about that. They may be concerned with the heat, not finding your hammer or discus under a foot of snow.
Before I heard Lance say those words, I never really had thought about it. I never thought about how far someone should be able to throw at any given time. Do any other coaches out there have a variable or predictor of throwing success? I’m not talking about the “secret” to throwing, but does anyone else think it is realistic that our throwers should be able to throw up to 90% of their best, even on their worst days? What are your thoughts?
I took to Twitter the other day and asked what type of content people would like to learn more about or hear more about with our Forza Athletics Podcast. One of the topics that came up multiple times was recruiting. Nothing specific, but just recruiting.
With that in mind, below you will find my five things to consider when deciding what college to attend. Our example will be for a high school senior that will be assured a full-athletic scholarship in which tuition, room, board, and meals will all be included. For the sake of this example, we know that finances will not play a role in the decision-making process because you will be assured that all expenses will be paid. This is hypothetical, but please play along for the example.
-Note, These are in no Particular Order-
1. Current Coaching Situation
2. “Feel” of the Location
4. Team Atmosphere
5. Other—Everything that may play a role for some or for none at all
What did I miss?
As always, thanks for reading!
Continuing with our conversation from last week, the researcher in me wanted to further explore the notion of coaches as experts. Rather than guess what athletes might say about the topic, I asked them. I took to Twitter to ask athletes what they thought was most important when considering to work with a weightlifting and/or throwing coach. Below you will see the four options with the percent of votes per option.
I’ve been thinking about these results for the past couple of days. Only half of the voters selected the second option of the most important trait in selecting a weightlifting and/or throwing coach was past athlete successes. I was a little taken aback by these results. My guess would have been that more than just half of the votes would have gone to this option. A couple of thoughts with this result:
When I wrote the option of past athlete successes, my thought process was that of accomplishments in either weightlifting and throwing. For example, past athlete successes as a trait when hiring an Olympic weightlifting coach, to me means someone who has coached individuals that have previously (within the past three years) qualified for the American Open, USA Championships, and Olympic Trials. I realize that there are more national championships for Olympic weightlifting, however at my age I would only be eligible to qualify for the three I listed above. For a 10 or 11 year-old youth athlete, many more opportunities exist for competing at the national level, therefore the athlete and their family may not be as concerned with hiring an Olympic weightlifting coach that has coached XX number of athletes that have previously qualified for the Olympic Trials or USA Open Championships. Depending on where they live, there may not be a coach that fits that criteria for hundreds of miles. Virtually, however is an option that I will discuss in a later blog post.
Continuing with my example, at my age (35) I would be most interested in hiring an Olympic weightlifting coach that has worked with other lifters my age-in which those other lifters competed in the American Open, Masters Nationals, and even possibly the USA Championships. At my age, the Olympic Trials would totally be out of the question. For a youth athlete, however, a coach who may have already coached youth athletes to the youth nationals may qualify and meet the definition of “success”. Ultimately I think it would depend on what the athlete’s goals are, what the family goals are, and what their reality and expectations are in achieving those goals.
Similarly, I don’t think a coach needs lots of years of experience or prior athletic success in order to be a successful coach themselves. Some coaches I know have very limited years of experience, yet they have coached multiple athletes to All-American status in the throws at the Division II and Division III level. I myself had very limited success as an athlete at the Division III level (1 conference championship in the Hammer throw). One of my first athletes I coached at Fredonia had somewhat limited success at the collegiate level, and now is one of the most prominent throwing coaches at the Division II level. He is dedicated to the craft of coaching, is open to learning from others, is a student of throwing, and has invested time in traveling around North America to learn from Olympic and Pan-American Medalist Hammer throwers.
Even more surprising than the votes garnered by option two were the results of option 4, “other”. I thought about adding a fourth option about relationship development/comfort/personality, but I didn’t want to try and get everything else into that option. With a quarter of the votes going to this option, I may consider conducting another Twitter poll that is made up of those traits/qualities listed above. A researcher in the field of athlete self-efficacy and resiliency that is currently working on her dissertation posted a great comment on my Instagram page the other day about questions she would ask if being recruited at the collegiate level. You can see her questions below.
I wish I would have asked those questions when I was 18 years old when trying to decide which college to attend. I selected SUNY Fredonia for a couple of reasons—one of which was that SUNY Fredonia had won over 30 conference championships between 1976 and 2000 in combined indoor and outdoor competitions. I didn’t ask those questions when I was trying to select between my college options. I wish I would have.
Besides the questions Sara listed above, what questions would you want to ask on a recruiting trip? For the coaches out there, how would you answer the questions listed above? Will your answers vary depending on what level you are coaching (Division I, or Division II, or Division III)? Should your answers vary?
As always, thanks for reading ~ Charles
Last week I started reading a series of articles on my desk about coaching mental toughness in athletes. A wide range and variety of articles published in peer reviewed journals by some of the most respected and brilliant sports psychologists and researchers in the world. One of the articles that was sent to me by a friend was recently published in 2017, and spoke about a business coaching methodology and framework reformatted to be implemented with a group of elite level soccer coaches and their athletes. The focus of the study was to teach elite level soccer coaches in Europe a variety of ways to introduce and help develop the mental toughness of their athletes.
The methodology implemented in the study was adapted from the business model developed by John Whitmore, from his book titled Coaching for Performance: GROWing human potential and purpose, the principals and practice of coaching and leadership, 4th edition. I immediately ordered the book because the coaching framework makes a lot of sense to me. I’m always interested in learning more about how business models of coaching individuals and teams are applied to the sports world, especially for research. However, one brief section in the book caught my attention. On page 42, John wrote a very concise paragraph about the coach as an expert. One sentence in particular struck me, and I have been thinking about it since I read it. John wrote, “Does a coach need to have experience or technical knowledge in the area in which he is coaching?”
Over the next couple of weeks I’m going to spend some time digging down and really reflecting on the notion of coaches as experts in their specific fields of instruction. How much, if any, does prior competitive throwing experience really matter in the eyes of potential recruits and athletes at the collegiate and post-collegiate level? For example, would a Division I recruit not attend a specific college or university because their event specific throwing coach never threw in college? Would that same recruit commit to a college if they knew their throwing coach never threw, but had already coached XX All-Americans and X National Champions?
So, for those of you that are still reading, I pose a question: From the perspective of a competitive thrower, to what capacity, if any, would you feel comfortable being coached by someone with no prior experience as a thrower and little to no technical background knowledge in the shot-put, discus, hammer, weight throw, and javelin? How much does prior competitive experience really matter in the eyes of high school, collegiate, and post-collegiate athletes?
Stay tuned for Part 2 of this series.
As always, thanks for reading-Charles
“The vision of a champion is someone who is bent over, drenched in sweat, at the point of exhaustion when nobody else is watching.”
-Anson Dorrance, The Vision of a Champion
It’s dark. It’s gloomy. It’s pouring rain. For most throwers, this may be a sign to call it a day, not throw, and not risk injury. However, for some throwers, this is another opportunity to look deep down inside themselves and make a concerted effort to get better. Another opportunity to reach their goals. Regardless of the conditions, these throwers dig down deep when nobody is watching in order to satisfy a need, accomplish a goal, or simply continue to chase their dream.
The cliché often used in literary verses is that a picture is worth a thousand words. The picture above sums up so much more than a thousand however. In a state of pure joy and happiness, I got this picture in a text message last night at around 7:45pm. It is not just a picture of a hammer in the sector, but is a symbol of grit, determination, work-ethic. With nobody around, alone at practice, Savannah broke through the 50m barrier. I will not downplay the obvious that this was done in practice. It is so much more than that. It means so much more, especially as a coach, that I know Savannah will put in the work. Not because she has to, but because she wants to.
I’ve been coaching since I graduated from Fredonia in 2004. One of the facets I have found somewhat difficult to wrap my head around is the ability for coaches to coach heart. How do we as coaches instill the confidence, self-determination, and want-to in our athletes that may not always want-to? It’s a question I’ll continue to ask, and hopefully someday I’ll have an appropriate response.
However, I know heart when I see it. Savannah has heart. That it factor. Sports personalities and professional wrestling scouts frequently discuss the it factor. It’s difficult to describe. The it factor is a combination of many factors, qualities, and perhaps personality traits that seem to align for specific athletes and individuals around the world. Even though it is difficult to describe, the guru’s say they know it when they see it. I’m not a coaching guru, nor a throwing coach guru for that matter. However, I think I can identify it when I see it. Savannah has it.
Work-ethic alone is not enough. That is not the only pre-requisite to having it. Effort counts. According to Angela Duckworth, effort counts twice. Anders Ericsson has spent the last 20 years researching deliberate practice. Deliberate practice counts. Being diligent in what you do counts. Merely going through the motions will not suffice. That is not good enough. A lot of individuals merely go through the motions. Day-in, day-out we see talented individuals not take advantage of the great opportunities presented to them. As a coach, mentor, and friend I cannot put into words how proud I am of Savannah and all that she has accomplished in her relatively short throwing career. The intangible gifts she possesses will take her places. Savannah has it.
Do you have it?
If you look at the current landscape of throwing in the United States, you are quick to see that there are many up-and-coming throwers currently competing at the collegiate level. In the opening week of the outdoor season, Magdalyn Ewen, competing for Arizona State, broke the women's American collegian hammer record with a throw of 72.71m. There have been countless performances, such as this one, this past season.
Another young and up-and-coming thrower is Mckenzie Warren, throwing for Concordia University. She broke the Division II Indoor Shot-Put record with a throw of 17.62m.
With so many great performances coming this 2016-17 season, the researcher in me is thinking, "What type of support system(s) do throwers like Magdalyn and Mckenzie have in place that have allowed them the opportunity to reach the pinnacle of throwing in their respective events (Hammer & Shot-Put)?"
A great opportunity was presented to me the other day when Sean Donnelly, an up-and-coming American hammer thrower, invited people to ask him questions for Q&A he was conducting with fellow thrower Cullen Aubin. For those of you reading, you know I couldn't resist the temptation to ask Sean this question, "What people have contributed most to your post-collegiate success so far?" Thank you Cullen for selecting my question. Thank you Sean for answering. You can find his answer below.
You can find Cullen's Youtube page below.
For the current collegiate and post-collegiate throwers out there, in what ways do you feel your support system has contributed to your throwing success? Are there specific people that assisted you early on in your throwing career that paved the way for you? Do you feel it was the physical environment and location? Have training partners played a role in your success?
Like I mentioned on Sean's Youtube comments, I believe it is important for throwers to share their message's for others to hear. Throwing is a relatively obscure sport, however sharing your why and putting yourself out there can generate a following, or social media support system, that gets behind you and is interested in your throwing success. It's difficult to support someone if you don't know that much about them, what they like and don't like, and do what they do.
As always, thanks for reading. Please share your comments below, on Facebook, or even on Instagram.
One of the best decisions I ever made was to get into coaching. In all honesty, it really happened by chance. Mid-way through my senior year at SUNY Fredonia, our head men’s track & field coach notified the athletic director that he would not returning the following year. Our men’s head coach was also my throwing coach. That fall semester, our interim head coach asked me if I would be interested in coaching the throwers. I had coached recreation soccer teams before, so how hard could it be to coach the throwers I was previously teammates with? I learned early on that it wasn’t going to be as easy as I perceived it to be.
1. You don’t know what you don’t know
I really had no idea what I was doing for the first couple months I was working with our throwers. I had a basic idea of what I wanted them to do in the weight room. Up until that point in time, our previous throwing coach never really gave us a weightlifting program. He encouraged us to squat, bench, and deadlift. I thought I knew what I was doing, but I was wrong (insert picture of first training program here).
Throwing wise, I thought I knew how to teach throwers how to throw. I understood basic weight throw and shot-put concepts. I implemented what I had learned from my previous three throwing coaches. We used a lot of chairs and tape while completing turning drills to perfect our weight throwing technique. We also ran a lot of stairs.
My advice to new throwing coaches—seek out a mentor. Someone you respect and would like to learn from. Coaching throwers is difficult, even if you have previous throwing experience. I wish I would have sought out the assistance of other coaches sooner than I had.
2. You are Coaching Your Athletes, Not Your Friends
Coaching my previous teammates was not all it was cracked up to be. I thought it was going to be pretty easy. I was mistaken. One thing I did not take into consideration when I accepted the throwing coach position was the previous history I had with the athletes that were now in my care. It’s probably something most people don’t think about when they accept a position as an assistant coach at the school they had just graduated from. You may go from partying together, to training together, and to complaining about the coaching staff together to now trying to lead and coach these individuals. I found it to be a difficult transition because I thought I was going to be treated like their coach. I don’t believe I was at first. I think we were more friends than coach and athletes. This was my fault.
My advice to new throwing coaches—establish expectations with your athletes. Whether you are coaching athletes you were previously teammates with or not, establish clear coach-athlete expectations. They need to be enforced. When things get blurry, it isn’t only bad for the coach, but just as bad for the athletes as well.
3. Respect is Earned, Not Given
It was my assumption that the throwers I had previously been teammates with were going to treat me differently now that I was their coach. Well, you know what they say assuming things…We had a couple of freshman throwers that joined my first season, 2004-2005. We also had some first time throwers join our team during the spring semester. The transition for the new throwers and myself was fairly seamless. They knew that I had spent the previous four years as an athlete at SUNY Fredonia. They didn’t see me as their teammate, so things went fairly well.
Establishing the coach-athlete relationship with my returning throwers was a bit difficult. We had some issues maintaining accountability with getting to the weightroom and communication if someone was going to be late or miss practice. You see, twelve years ago most people did not have cell phones. It was much more difficult to communicate, especially if it was expected that you were going to be someplace, but then not show up. Now, if my athletes meet with a professor or their work groups after class, I get a text message letting me know that they will be a couple of minutes. That wasn’t the case back in 2004. I had to meet with some individuals on a couple of occasions to remind them that they were the team leaders and needed to set a positive example for their less experienced teammates. After our initial meetings, the season went on much more smoothly than it probably could have been.
My advice to new throwing coaches—do not assume your athletes will respect you from the first day of practice just because you are their coach. Establish consistency and routines that will set the tone for your season. Athletes can easily tell if you are playing favorites or not being honest with them. Maintain open lines of communication, and make sure to discuss issues immediately when they arise. Do not let things fester because the situation may get worse.
Above Left: Jen and I at Outdoor SUNYACS where we both won the hammer (April, 2004)
Above Right: Jen, Tim, and I at an Outdoor meet at the University of Buffalo (April, 2005)
4. You Can’t Judge a Book by it’s Cover
This is most certainly the lesson I carry with me into every new season. One of the best throwers I have ever coached came out for the team in January, 2005. We’ll call this thrower Claude. At the time, Claude stood about 6’3” and weighed maybe 200lbs. He approached me at one of our practices and told me he wanted to be a thrower. I said that it would not be a problem. Claude told me that he had never thrown before, but was a member of his high school Cross Country team (great).
After a couple days of learn-to-turn, I told Claude to take 100 hammer turns a day before he started throwing. I gave him a hammer, showed him with line to turn on, and just left him there. I didn’t watch his turns, form, technique, or anything. That progressed for most of that first season. Claude threw at the Indoor State Championships, throwing just over 40’ in the 35lb. Weight Throw.
That following season, Claude was like a man on a mission. He followed the training program over the summer, and came back ready to compete in 2005. And compete he did. Claude scored at the Indoor SUNYAC and Indoor State conference championships in the 35lb. Weight Throw. He finished that season ranked 9th all-time at SUNY Fredonia with a throw of 51’. He also scored at the Outdoor SUNYAC and Outdoor State conference championships in the Hammer. He finished the season throwing over 50m (167’), and was ranked 8th all-time at SUNY Fredonia in the Hammer Throw.
My advice to new throwing coaches—you never know what kind of talent you have on your roster. I really didn’t pay much attention to Claude when he started throwing for us at SUNY Fredonia. He turned out to be one of the best throwers I have ever coached. His work ethic and determination could not be surpassed. It was as though he willed himself to success. Now, I welcome anyone that is interested in throwing. As a coach, you just never know how someone may take to the Hammer, Weight, Discus, or Shot-Put. I pay much more attention to new throwers than I did my first year at SUNY Fredonia. Over the course of four years new throwers may develop into competitors that may score or even win conference championships. You just never know.
5. Think About a Philosophy—What Type of Coach Do You Want To Be
I think it is clear to those of you still reading that I really didn’t have much of an idea as to what I was doing. I admit that I was not that great when it came to organizing practice, tailoring programs to individuals, and thinking big picture. I was mostly focused on being just a couple of days ahead of my kids. Before I have any inkling that I would be coaching, I accepted a full-time teaching job and was enrolled in graduate school at SUNY Fredonia. Many of my graduate course professors were open to me completing assignments about coaching leadership, and not always about school leadership.
One of my curriculum and instruction courses was focused on developing a curriculum plan and map for any subject of our choosing. Rather than write about teaching, I wrote about throwing programs and the type of coach I wanted to be (insert picture of that binder here, if I can find it). I’ve always had the philosophy to give my throwers autonomy in a lot of things that directly have an effect on them during the season-practice time and lifting time. One of my throwers at SUNY Fredonia my first year was a senior, and was student-teaching. She could not make our 3pm start time because she was still in school. I tried being as flexible with her as I could in order to ensure she was given equal practice time. That worked because of the expectations we had set with all the throwers (see #2 and #3). The same went with lifting. A majority of the athletes I coached were education majors. Their schedules were all the same, so they lifted together. For some of the other throwers I coached, their schedules were much different. Some had all evening classes, some had internships, and some had jobs. I spent more time at SUNY Fredonia my first year than I probably did honing my teaching skills. That was my philosophy. I wanted to provide all my throwers with equal time that met their needs. I also wanted to work with my throwers to make them part of the process. They took ownership over our practice times and rarely missed anything because I allowed them to be part of the process.
My advice to new throwing coaches—begin to develop a coaching philosophy sooner than you think you need to. Whether you are coaching high school, college, or post-collegiate athletes, make sure you stand for something that you are passionate about. Are you going to allow your athletes some autonomy with schedules, is it always your way or the highway, or are you going to be someplace in the middle? Figuring that out will ensure to make your start to coaching smoother and more efficient than if you don’t have a plan for yourself and how you want to lead the athletes in your care.
Tim, Jen, Meredith, Claude, and I at Outdoor States (May, 2005)
I just got back from the ECAC Division III Indoor Track & Field Championships held at Ithaca College. Besides being a championship meet, the ECAC meet can be considered a last chance qualifier for DIII Indoor Nationals for teams on the east coast. In order to compete at this meet, you need to meet specific standards across all running, jumping, and throwing events.
During a break in the competition, a few coaches and I took advantage of the coaches hospitality room, had a great lunch, and engaged in some pretty good conversation about what it takes to throw far. Not just throwing far in college, but throwing far after college as well.
Dr. Angela Duckwork with two of her students at Hamilton College, February 21, 2017. Photo credit Charles J. Infurna.
One of the coaches, a high school chemistry teacher and coach of over a dozen All-American throwers at the DIII level, brought up the topic of deliberate practice. Below you will find Angela Duckworth's definition of deliberate practice.
Dr. Angela Duckworth speaking at Hamilton College on 2.21.17. Photo credit Charles J. Infurna.
If you have not had a chance to read Angela's book, I highly encourage everyone to do so. An easy book to read with limited psychological jargon, with great insight on what variables need to be present in order to be considered a gritty person. As the picture suggests, there are four steps to deliberate practice, discussed almost verbatim today at lunch.
Step #1: Set a stretch goal
Now, in Angela's talk a few weeks ago, she spent a lot of time talking about stretch goals. She discussed the notion that stretch goals should be realistic, and not so far-fetched that they could never possibly be accomplished. For example, if you are a male 40' shot-putter your freshman year of college, it may not be that realistic for you to set a stretch goal of winning the following season's national championship. A more realistic and manageable goal might be to throw 45' the following season and score in the conference championship.
I spent a great deal of time at the beginning of the this season meeting with my athletes to discuss their goals. I believe it is important for coaches and athletes to have these types of conversations not only at the beginning of the season, but throughout the season. You may hit that 45' throw in the first meet of the season. Now you can have a conversation about next steps/goals for the remainder of the season.
Step #2: 100% Focus
In my humble opinion, I believe this is the most difficult step in the deliberate practice process. For those of you reading this, you may coach high school or college athletes. Therefore, we coach athletes that are between the ages of 14-23. No offense to any athletes in this age group, but some of you can be easily distracted. None of my throwers bring their cell phones into our practice racquetball court. This eliminates the potential distraction of checking their latest Snapchat or Instagram comment.
It is important to stress to our athletes that from the time they begin practice until practice is done, that they have their minds on practice. I see it pretty much everyday with my athletes. They just came from class and found out they did poorly on a test. Or their boyfriend/girlfriend didn't text them back in 10 seconds (insert sarcasm here). Believe me, I understand that. However, it seems that some athletes still have difficulty with focusing on something.
I have tried implementing a one cue rule for myself. Rather than tell my kids two or three or four things they didn't do well, I have made it a goal of mine to only tell them to focus on one thing. Get that thing right, then we move onto the next thing. Some athletes hear the same thing for two or three weeks. It is much easier to focus on one thing, than try to focus on multiple things at the same time.
Step #3: Get Feedback
In some cases, this step may be the easiest for coaches and athletes to work with. Hoping your coaching relationships with your athletes are healthy and open, this should be an easy step to grasp. It is important for us as coaches to provide our athletes with honest and constructive feedback. Try to emphasize the positive while working together on the negative. I elicit feedback from my athletes as well. Now, I don't ask them how every practice went, but I do want to know what cues work better for them than others. I try not to provide a lot of feedback at meets. By meet time, everything should be pretty much worked out. Yes, we do encounter some things at meets, and we adjust. I've noticed that the coaches that speak to their athletes the most at meets, especially big meets like nationals, don't tend to fare as well as other athletes that have minimal contact/conversation with their coaches. You are already at nationals. Focus on the positive, provide healthy feedback, and know what cues work best for your athletes.
Hammer practice with Luis Rivera before DIII Outdoor Track and Field National Championships, May, 2016. Photo credit to Nazareth College.
Step #4: Reflect and Refine
This may be the most crucial step in the deliberate practice cycle. For the coaches reading this article, how often do you sit back after a meet and reflect on how the meet went? Reflecting on track meets has probably given me more grey hairs than anything else in my life.
Do you reflect on goals with your athletes? As coaches, are you open to receive constructive criticism and feedback from your athletes? I usually only have this type of conversation with my athletes a couple times a year-once after the indoor season and then before they go home for the summer after our outdoor season.
I believe it is important for me to know what I need to work on in the off-season to become a better coach. Just as we expect our athletes to complete our conditioning and training programs while they are home for the summer, we as coaches should work on things that can help us be more efficient coaches. I have seen many posts this year on Instagram or videos on YouTube with coaches sharing how they work on their craft over the summer. Some coaches read. Others attend conferences and workshops.
What do you do to help yourself grow as a coach?
As always, thanks for reading. If I missed anything, please let me know. Leave a comment below.
Two of the books I've read this year. If you have not had the chance to read any books by Jon Gordon, The Hard Hat would be a great one to start with. Champions is a great book that provides interesting insight into the development of Olympic Swimmers. Dr. Daniel F. Chambliss is a professor at Hamilton College, located in Clinton, NY.
A few months ago I came across a research article titled The Mundanity of Excellence: An Ethnographic Report on Stratification and Olympic Swimmers, by Dr. Daniel F. Chambliss. If I would have came across this article two years ago, I probably would have focused my dissertation research on something along these lines, with a emphasis on throwers in track & field.
A couple of weeks ago, on my way back from an early childhood education meeting in Albany, I contacted Dr. Chambliss to see if I could meet with him on my way back to Rochester. To my delight, he agreed to give me an hour of his time. Dr. Chambliss is a distinguished professor of Sociology at Hamilton College, located in Clinton, NY. It is about a two hour drive from Rochester.
I was more nervous than anything when we met. It was my first time speaking to someone who had such an interest in Olympic athletes as I do. In 1988, Dr. Chambliss published a book titled Champions: The Making of Olympic Swimmers. If you have not read this book, and are interested in Olympic level performance, you need to. A link to purchase his book can be found here www.amazon.com/gp/offer-listing/0688076181/ref=tmm_hrd_used_olp_sr?ie=UTF8&condition=used&qid=1488309791&sr=8-15
One of the first questions I asked Dr. Chambliss was about how he got the idea to research Olympic swimmers. He told me he was a local club swimming coach in Clinton, and was recently hired by Hamilton College. As is with most colleges/universities, professors are required to have a certain amount of publications within a certain amount of years before being granted tenure. He spoke to his then dean and inquired about learning more about the development of Olympic Swimmers. At the suggestion of his dean, rather than write the Mission Viejo Nadadores Swim Club a letter asking about the research opportunity, his dean told him to, "just show up." And off he went.
We also spoke about buy-in and getting the most out of your athletes. Dr. Chambliss shared with me that he and then assistant coach were going to tell their current athletes and families that they would be traveling to a major competition within the next three to six months, and that they would bring anyone on the team that made the qualifying times. At the time they suggested this to their athletes and families, not one of the athletes on the team had hit the qualifying times. Well, in that short amount of time, about eight athletes had indeed qualified. Dr. Chambliss simply told me they raised the expectations of the team by suggesting they would be going to a bigger meet with better competition. His athletes became more enthusiastic about training, and quickly qualified for the major competition.
That concludes Part I of my two part series on my first meeting with Dr. Chambliss. Check back next week when I publish post two on our meeting at Hamilton College. As always, thanks for reading.
After my meeting with Dr. Chambliss a few weeks ago, I decided I would put my curiosities to the test. In the hopes of learning more about throwers, and why post-collegiate throwers still compete, a colleague and I wrote an Internal Review Board (IRB) application through St. John Fisher College. Our IRB application is necessary if we plan on publishing the results of our qualitative study, which we plan on doing.
The scope of our research will be focused on interviewing 10-12 post-collegiate throwers. We have a series of questions we will be asking participants, 10 in total, in the hopes of learning more about why people who have graduated from college continue throwing at the post-collegiate level, with little to slim possibilities of qualifying for the Olympic Games or World Championships. A lot of work and research has been conducted on Olympic and World Championship participants in many different sports (track & field, rowing, tennis, weightlifting, etc.), however, my current literature review has yielded very little empirical studies conducted on non-world class/elite athletes, none in the throwing realm.
If you are interested in participating in this study, please contact me at email@example.com. We currently have five throwers that had stated their interest in participating. I will email you more information if interested.